Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

FS

FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 revenue of $26.0M grew 30% q/q and 157% y/y, with non-GAAP gross margin turning positive to 7.7%; GAAP gross margin was 6.1% . Adjusted EBITDA improved to a five-year best at -$4.0M, materially better than Q2 (-$10.4M) and Q1 (-$9.8M) .
  • Versus S&P Global consensus, FTC Solar delivered a revenue beat and an adjusted EPS beat in Q3; GAAP net loss was impacted by a non-cash $16.1M warrant liability fair value increase due to share price appreciation . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
  • Q4 guidance initiated: revenue $30–$35M, non-GAAP gross margin 12.7%–23.4%, non-GAAP opex $8.2–$9.0M, and adjusted EBITDA -$5.4M to breakeven; management expects continued sequential growth and margin expansion .
  • Strategic catalysts: return to positive gross margin, Alpha Steel acquisition for domestic content and 45X access, expanded MSAs >7.5GW, and product differentiation (80° high-angle hail stow, 2000V-ready, washerless tracker) supporting pipeline conversion in 2026 .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Above guidance on “nearly all metrics,” with revenue at eight-quarter high, and adjusted EBITDA at best level in five years; “growth trajectory” affirmed by CEO .
  • Non-GAAP gross margin positive for first time since late 2023, driven by higher-margin revenue pull-forward and cost actions; GAAP gross margin improved >2,500 bps q/q .
  • Strategic progress: closed $37.5M of $75M facility; acquired remaining 55% of Alpha Steel to enhance domestic content, lower COGS, and improve margins/EBITDA; backlog contracted portion at ~$462M .

What Went Wrong

  • GAAP net loss widened to -$23.9M due to a non-cash $16.1M increase in warrant liability as the stock rose; management emphasized this does not reflect underlying operations .
  • Non-GAAP opex rose to $8.0M from $6.5M in Q2 given scaling activity, though still below y/y ($8.1M) .
  • Accounts receivable climbed with execution activity, raising working capital intensity; management linked AR elevation to project phase timing .

Financial Results

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD)$20.803M $19.993M $26.030M
GAAP Gross Margin (%)(16.6%) (19.6%) 6.1%
Non-GAAP Gross Margin (%)(14.4%) (17.4%) 7.7%
GAAP Diluted EPS$(0.58) $(1.18) $(1.61)
Adjusted EPS (Company)$(0.84) $(0.86) $(0.36)
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD)$(9.750)M $(10.360)M $(3.962)M

Segment Revenue

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Product Revenue ($USD)$18.202M $15.867M $20.061M
Service Revenue ($USD)$2.601M $4.126M $5.969M

KPIs and Balance Sheet

KPIQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Contracted Backlog ($USD)~$482M ~$470M ~$462M
Cash & Equivalents ($USD)$5.909M $3.519M $24.369M
Accounts Receivable, Net ($USD)$44.238M $45.648M $49.193M
Long-term Debt ($USD)$10.169M $10.895M $16.648M
Warrant Liability ($USD)$4.916M $0 $48.127M

Vs. S&P Global Consensus

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue Consensus Mean ($USD)$18.827M*$20.062M*$21.117M*
Actual Revenue ($USD)$20.803M $19.993M $26.030M
Primary EPS Consensus Mean ($USD)$(0.762)*$(0.717)*$(0.532)*
Actual Adjusted EPS ($USD)$(0.84) $(0.86) $(0.36)
EBITDA Consensus Mean ($USD)$(10.509)M*$(11.592)M*$(8.610)M*
Actual EBITDA (SPGI-defined) ($USD)$(10.258)M*$(11.194)M*$(7.415)M*

Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Key implications:

  • Q3 revenue: Beat vs consensus and vs guidance high-end .
  • Adjusted EPS: Beat vs consensus in Q3; closer to breakeven trajectory .
  • Note: Company “Adjusted EBITDA” differs from SPGI’s EBITDA definition; comparisons should consider definitional differences .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Revenue ($USD)Q3 2025$18.0–$24.0 (Aug 5) Actual: $26.0M Beat vs guidance
Non-GAAP Gross Margin (%)Q3 2025(13.4%)–2.5% Actual: 7.7% Beat vs guidance
Non-GAAP Opex ($USD)Q3 2025$7.2–$7.9M Actual: $8.0M Slightly above
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD)Q3 2025$(10.8)–$(6.8)M Actual: $(4.0)M Beat vs guidance
Revenue ($USD)Q4 2025—$30.0–$35.0M Initiated
Non-GAAP Gross Margin (%)Q4 2025—12.7%–23.4% Initiated
Non-GAAP Opex ($USD)Q4 2025—$8.2–$9.0M Initiated
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD)Q4 2025—$(5.4)M to $0.0M Initiated

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2)Current Period (Q3)Trend
Product innovationHigh-wind, terrain-following, broad stow range introduced; 2000V extra-long tracker highlighted 80° high-angle stow launched; washerless tracker announced; emphasis on fastest installation and robotics compatibility Accelerating innovation and feature set
Supply chain & domestic contentBuilding domestic content capability; ongoing cost focus Optimizing global supply chain for tariff flexibility; Alpha Steel full ownership to lower COGS and access 45X Improving flexibility and margin tailwinds
Tariffs/macroRegulatory uncertainty slowed some planning Tariffs largely contractual pass-through; longer PPA negotiations observed Manageable headwind via pass-throughs
Market development & MSAs>6.5GW agreements; growing bid activity MSAs >7.5GW; approvals on major EPC AVLs; demos and hands-on drive traction Expanding funnel and conversion readiness
Regional trendsAustralia project announced (300+ MW) US pipeline expanded; continued international progress; Australia highlighted for labor economics Broadening geographic opportunity
R&D executionExpanded 1P line features Constructability KPI: 0.053 labor hours per module; 75-module row in <1 hour demo Tangible build-speed advantages
Regulatory/legal & incentivesITC/45X uncertainties referenced Post-quarter: Alpha Steel acquisition aligns with OBBB guidance and 45X Sharper positioning for incentives

Management Commentary

  • “Third quarter results came in above the high-end of our guidance ranges on nearly all metrics… revenue up nearly 160% y/y… operating income and adjusted EBITDA at the highest levels in 5 years” – CEO Yann Brandt .
  • “The outperformance… was largely driven by a pull forward of material production to meet customer demand… at a higher margin” – CFO Cathy Behnen .
  • “Following the close… FTC Solar became the sole owner of Alpha Steel… giving the company full control… unlocking additional profit potential… lower COGS, improve gross margin, and higher adjusted EBITDA” – CFO .
  • “We expect to be adjusted EBITDA positive for the full year in 2026” – CEO .
  • “Our constructability… 0.053 labor hours per module… nearly two times faster than our largest peers” – CEO .

Q&A Highlights

  • Levona 1GW agreement and international pipeline: management supports early-stage design to accelerate NTP; Australia highlighted for labor-driven TCO advantages .
  • 2026 outlook: qualitative confidence; target to be adjusted EBITDA positive for FY26; cautious on near-term gross margin specifics .
  • Liquidity: remaining $37.5M facility optional; current focus on execution; facility helps customer confidence .
  • MSAs and bookings: >7.5GW; MSAs ease contracting (preferred vendor terms), including EPC relationships; building mid-funnel backlog .
  • Working capital: elevated AR consistent with revenue growth and project execution timing; CFO commentary .
  • Alpha Steel: 100% ownership improves operational certainty, domestic content, and 45X access; helpful for customer compliance .
  • Tariffs: generally passed through; can elongate PPA negotiations; not disclosed quantitatively .
  • Competitiveness in difficult soils: lower top-of-pile loads; wide foundation options via market ecosystem; constructability remains key differentiator .

Estimates Context

  • Q3 revenue beat consensus ($26.0M vs $21.1M)* and adjusted EPS beat (-(0.36) vs -(0.53)); sequential momentum consistent with Q4 guide . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
  • SPGI EBITDA “actual” differs from company Adjusted EBITDA due to definition; investor comparisons should consider the reconciliation in company filings . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
  • Prior quarters showed mixed dynamics: revenue beat in Q1 ($20.8M vs $18.8M)* and a small miss in Q2 ($20.0M vs $20.1M); adjusted EPS tracked consensus closely in Q1/Q2 . Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Positive inflection in gross margin and adjusted EBITDA with Q3 beats vs guidance and consensus; Q4 guide points to further margin expansion toward 12.7%–23.4% .
  • Non-cash warrant liability revaluation (+$16.1M) inflated GAAP loss; focus should remain on underlying margins/EBITDA trajectory .
  • Domestic content strategy strengthened: full Alpha Steel ownership expected to lower COGS and support 45X credits; a margin tailwind into 2026 .
  • Commercial traction building via MSAs (>7.5GW), AVL approvals, and hands-on demos; constructability KPI (0.053 hours/module) and robotics-friendly design are differentiators with labor constraints .
  • Backlog contracted portion (~$462M) remains substantial, while AR growth reflects scaling activity; monitor working capital discipline and cash conversion .
  • Near-term trading lens: catalysts include sustained margin recovery, Q4 execution vs guidance, and any new MSA-driven bookings; watch for updates on international wins and US tier-one EPC conversions .
  • Medium-term thesis: pursuing adjusted EBITDA breakeven/breakthrough by Q4 and full-year positive in 2026, supported by product innovation (80° stow, 2000V readiness, washerless tracker) and supply chain optimization .